PSYCHOANALYTIC WRITING. REVIEW OF D. L. KANTROWITZ’S «WRITING ABOUT PATIENTS: RESPONSIBILITIES, RISKS, AND RAMIFICATIONS»

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/upj/2025-3-2-13

Keywords:

publishing ethics, clinical case, confidentiality, disguise, psychoanalysis

Abstract

This article describes the structure and content of Judy Leopold Kantrowitz’s book «Writing about patients: Responsibilities, risks, and ramifications». This book is a comprehensive study of the complex and simultaneously fascinating topic of psychoanalytic writing. How do analysts decide what and how to write about their patients? How can they balance the need for scientific progress with the ethics of confidentiality? What are the risks of publishing clinical material, and how do they impact patients and the therapeutic process? The answers to these questions are the focus of Kantrowitz’s work, which offers a unique combination of theoretical reflections and practical experience. The author of the article briefly describes the content of each of the four chapters of the book, presented in the following order: «Analysts’ attitudes and practices», «Analysts’ perceptions of the effect on patients», «Patients’ accounts of the effect of reading about themselves», and «Other considerations in clinical writing». Overall, Kantrowitz examines the guidelines and practices of 141 psychoanalysts who have published clinical vignettes at least once and identifies changes in writing approaches depending on theoretical orientation and the author’s affiliation with a particular professional group, as revealed through publications in leading psychoanalytic journals. The article compares methods of preserving confidentiality using publications in journals such as International Journal of Psychoanalysis (IJP), Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (JAPA), and Psychoanalytic Dialogues as examples. Kantrowitz separately addresses the experience of 37 patients who read texts about themselves, examining cases where patients independently found descriptions of their material, as well as their experiences discussing the texts with their therapists. The article will be useful for practicing psychoanalysts, researchers, and anyone interested in the ethics and practice of psychoanalytic writing. It encourages reflection on the relationship between clinical practice and publication, uncovering deep ethical and methodological aspects of this activity.

References

Deutsch, H. (1921). On the pathological lie (pseudologia phantastica). Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 10, 369–386, 1982.

Freud, A. (1922). Beating fantasies and daydreams. In The Writings of Anna Freud I. New York: International Universities Press, 137–157.

Freud, S. (1899). Screen memories. Standard Edition, 3, 301–322.

Freud, S. (1905). Fragments of an analysis of a case of hysteria. Standard Edition VMAs.

Friedlander, S. (1995). The “third” party in psychoanalysis: Lacan, the signifier, and the symbolic order. Clinical Studies International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1, 17–31.

Furlong, A. (1998). Should we or shouldn’t we? Some aspects of confidentiality of clinical reporting and dossier access. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 727–739.

Furlong, A. (2004). Discussion of Kantrowitz, J. L., Writing about patients I: patients’ reading about themselves and their analysts’ perceptions of its effect.

Gerson, S. (2000). Therapeutic action of writing about patients: commentary on papers by Lewis Aron and by Stuart A. Pizer. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10, 261–266.

Kantrowitz, J. L. (2006). Writing about patients: Responsibilities, risks, and ramifications. New York: Other Press, 342 p.

Kohut, H. (1979). The two analyses of Mr. Z. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 60, 3–27.

Lafarge, L. (2000). Interpretation and containment. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 67–84.

Pizer, S. A. (2000). A gift in return: the clinical use of writing about a patient. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 10, 247–259.

Roth, P. (1969). Portnoy’s Complaint. New York: Random House.

Roth, P. (1970). My Life as a Man. New York, Chicago, San Francisco: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Stein, M. H. (1988). Writing about psychoanalysis: II. Analysts who write, patients who read. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36, 393–408.

Stoller, R. J. (1988). Patients’ response to their own case report. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36, 371–391.

Published

2025-06-02

How to Cite

Bartosh, O. (2025). PSYCHOANALYTIC WRITING. REVIEW OF D. L. KANTROWITZ’S «WRITING ABOUT PATIENTS: RESPONSIBILITIES, RISKS, AND RAMIFICATIONS». Ukrainian Psychoanalytic Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.32782/upj/2025-3-2-13