THE FRONTIERS OF THE UNCONSCIOUS IN THE PSYCHOANALYSIS OF J. LACAN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/upj/2025-3-2-5

Keywords:

affect, Lacan, structural psychoanalysis, neuropsychoanalysis, unconscious, discourse, signifier, topology

Abstract

The controversial nature of the concept of the unconscious has generated numerous antinomic problems within psychoanalytic practice, necessitating its comprehensive reinterpretation. This article offers a theoretical reassessment of both the «classical» Freudian-Lacanian perspectives on the unconscious and the views of other contemporary authors within psychoanalytic and philosophical discourses (H.-D. Nasio, R. Jakobson, E. Sapir, J. Rancière, A. Badiou). Drawing on the linguistic theory of the signifier, the unconscious is conceptualized as a global macro-cultural entity that transcends the determinants of the psychoanalytic setting (i.e., mechanisms of transference and the «consulting room»/«cabinet» act). According to the framework presented in the article, the instance of repression can be explored without directly involving a specific subject in the analyst’s discourse. It is stripped of the phenomenology of reactivity on the part of the analysand and is instead linked to the general circulation of the «material» of the unconscious subject (signifiers) within the cultural space. The study argues that the emergence of the unconscious as a «rupture» is engendered by a specific psychic act of the subject, which is associated with a particular Desire and aimed at clarifying the ontological lack within the Symbolic order. To illustrate the processes of differentiation and interpenetration between psychoanalytic and broader social domains, the article employs principles of topological thinking related to the geometric object of the projective plane. Specifically, the positions of «extrinsic» (the egoic, mirror-level view of the signifier as a sign) and «intrinsic» (penetration into speech as lalangue and the analysis of Umwelt texts as intersections of chains of signification) represent two poles of the psychoanalytically attuned subject’s relationship with the «desire of S. Freud».

References

Badiou, A., Reinhard, K., & Spitzer, S. (2018). Lacan: Anti-Philosophy 3. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bragdon, S. (2014). Survey of graph embeddings into compact surfaces [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Maine.

Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Cortical Tracking of Hierarchical Linguistic Structures in Connected Speech. Nature Neuroscience. 19. 10.1038/nn.4186.

Freud, S. (1915). The Unconscious (Standard Edition, vol. 14, pp. 159–190). London: Hogarth.

Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and Time. HarperCollins.

Jakobson, R. (1985). Selected Writings. VII. Berlin. New York. Amsterdam: Mouton.

Lacan, J. (1981). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book XI, Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (J.-A. Miller, Ed.; A. Sheridan, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Lacan, J. (1991). Le Séminaire, Livre XVII, Tome 17: L’envers de la Psychanalyse. Paris: Seuil.

Lacan, J. (1999). Encore. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge (Book XX). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Lacan, J. (2001). Autres Écrits. Paris: Seuil.

Lacan, J. & Copjec, J. (Ed.). (1990). Television: A Сhallenge to the Psychoanalytic Establishment. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Lacan, J. & Miller, J.-A. (Ed.). (2019). Desire and Its Interpretation: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VI. (B. Fink, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lacan, J. (2020). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book 5, Formations of the Unconscious (J.-A. Miller, Ed.; R. Grigg, Trans.; Paperback ed). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mellard, J. (2006). Beyond Lacan. Albany: SUNY Press.

Nasio, J.-D. (1998). Five Lessons on the Psychoanalytic Theory of Jacques Lacan. New York: State University of New York Press.

Poincaré, H. (2018). Science and Hypothesis: The Complete Text. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Rancière, J. (2009). The Aesthetic Unconscious. Cambridge: Polity.

Sapir, E. (1927). The Unconscious Patterning of Behavior in Society. In The Unconscious: A Symposium, C. Child, K. Koffka, J. Anderson, J. Watson, E. Sapir, W. Thomas, M. Kenworthy, F. Wells, & W. White (Eds.), pp. 114–142. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Tupinambá, G. (2021). The Desire of Psychoanalysis: Exercises in Lacanian Thinking. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Van Dijk, T. (2014). Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach. In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds.), pp. 62–86. London: Sage.

Van Haute, P. (2002). Against Adaptation: Lacan’s «Subversion» of the Subject, transl. P. Crowe & M. Vankerk. New York: Other Press.

Бадью, А. (2009). Концепт моделі. Вступ до матеріалістичної епістемології математики (А. Рєпа, пер.). Київ: Ніка-Центр.

American Psychological Association. (n. d.). Journals. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals.

Published

2025-06-02

How to Cite

Gurskiy, Y. (2025). THE FRONTIERS OF THE UNCONSCIOUS IN THE PSYCHOANALYSIS OF J. LACAN. Ukrainian Psychoanalytic Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.32782/upj/2025-3-2-5